Teresa Moore - Model
💗0
Date: 23rd Oct 2008
New Zealand Model - 5'9"
[url=http://img294.imageshack.us/my.php?image=teresamooreinheeledbrowmc2.jpg][img]http://img294.imageshack.us/img294/2626/teresamooreinheeledbrowmc2.th.jpg[/img][/url]
Really impressive-looking woman. Great outfit for work, but the heels are too high for riding.
[url=http://img294.imageshack.us/my.php?image=teresamooreinheeledbrowmc2.jpg][img]http://img294.imageshack.us/img294/2626/teresamooreinheeledbrowmc2.th.jpg[/img][/url]
Really impressive-looking woman. Great outfit for work, but the heels are too high for riding.
NOT REALLY
💗0
Date: 23rd Oct 2008
ON EBAY you will find lots of high heels under the term RIDING BOOTS. Also on this forum you will see girls on horses with heels like that.
There shouldn't be "rules" for heel heights in riding boots anyway. The higher heels actually would keep feet in the stirrups better.
There shouldn't be "rules" for heel heights in riding boots anyway. The higher heels actually would keep feet in the stirrups better.
Re: NOT REALLY
💗0
Date: 24th Oct 2008
prussian_guard Wrote:
> There shouldn't be "rules" for heel heights in
> riding boots anyway. The higher heels actually
> would keep feet in the stirrups better.
The point is to have your heels down when you ride and not just have your feet in the stirrups - this of course would be impossible in the real world of riding horses with those boots and hence not suitable riding boots in my book.
> There shouldn't be "rules" for heel heights in
> riding boots anyway. The higher heels actually
> would keep feet in the stirrups better.
The point is to have your heels down when you ride and not just have your feet in the stirrups - this of course would be impossible in the real world of riding horses with those boots and hence not suitable riding boots in my book.
Re: Teresa Moore - Model
💗0
Date: 24th Oct 2008
shit, i don't ride, so you guys have got me by the ballocks, so as to speak, LOL
